Angela Merkel: Iron Lady or Poodle?

by David VIckrey
Published: Last Updated on 0 comment 5 views

merkelbush

The demise of the ruling Red-Green coalition in Berlin in the wake of the NRW election has put the neo-con establishment in Washington in a jubilant mood.  They always despised Schröder for his political success through exploiting anti-war and anti-American sentiment in Germany; they were enraged when Joschka Fischer dismissed Colin Powell’s "proof" of Iraqi WMDs with his famous words: "I am not convinced."  So Angela Merkel is seen as a reliable partner for the Bush administration.  John Fund in the Wall Street Journal  sums up the view from the White House: 

Bad news for Mr. Schroeder is also
good news for America. The Christian Democrats have announced that
Angela Merkel, their pro-U.S. party chairman, will be their candidate
for chancellor in the fall elections.

Ms. Merkel is a physicist who
lived in East Germany when the Berlin Wall came down in 1989. While
cautious, she is the closest thing German politics has to a Margaret
Thatcher. When asked earlier this year if she detected any similarities
between her ideas and the reforms that Britain’s Iron Lady carried out
in the 1980s, she told the Independent, a British newspaper, "My whole
life was changed by reunification. I have experienced change as
something good, not something to be avoided."

If German voters, tired of 12%
unemployment and of being portrayed as the "sick man of Europe," have
had enough this fall and throw out Mr. Schroeder, she may well get a
chance to prove how much change the notoriously risk-averse German
electorate can tolerate.

The ideal partner for President Bush would be a domestic "Iron Lady" who would phase out Germany’s social welfare system and a foriegn policy "poodle" a la Tony Blair who would go along with the hegemonic foreign policy of the United States.  The fact that Angela Merkel was initially supportive of the invasion of Iraq gives the White House reason to believe that "Angie" is their woman.

I have spent some time reading the material on Angela Merkel’s Web site and am beginning to believe that she will disappoint the Washington neo-cons on both fronts.   In an interview with FAZ she does indeed criticize the shrill anti-capitalistic rhetoric (locusts) of her opponents , but she comes across as anything but a neo-conservative free marketeer:

FAZS: Haben Sie Kritik am Kapitalismus?
  Merkel:
Ich bin eine Verfechterin der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Diese und nicht
der Kapitalismus ist die Wirtschafts- und Sozialordnung unseres Landes.
Und Anlass zur Kritik gibt es in jedem Bereich unseres Lebens, bei
Politikern, bei Journalisten und natürlich an mancher unternehmerischer
Entscheidung. Aber Kritik wird erst dann hilfreich, wenn Worten Taten
folgen können. Und wenn Unternehmen mit Boykottaufrufen konfrontiert
werden, dann wird jedem klar, dass es denjenigen, die so reden, nicht
um die Arbeitslosen und die Entwicklung der Wirtschaft in unserem Land
geht. Die Mehrheit der mittelständischen und kleinen Betriebe in
Deutschland sind Personengesellschaften. Die moralischen Appelle der
Regierung, patriotischer und sozialer zu handeln, nützen diesen
Betrieben und ihren Angestellten allein wirklich nichts. Patriotisch
und sozial ist der Arbeitgeber, der sich um Aufträge für seinen Betrieb
in Deutschland bemüht und damit Arbeitsplätze erhält. Patriotisch und
sozial handelt auch der Betriebsrat, der sich in schlechten Zeiten für
Mehrarbeit ohne Lohnausgleich einsetzt, damit sein Betrieb in
Deutschland bleiben kann.

With respect to US foreign policy, Merkel knows she needs to tread
lightly in her own country.  Disapproval of the Iraq War is broad and
deep in Germany, cutting across all prolitical parties.  In her own
comments she is rather perspicacious concerning Iraq and the global
policies of the US.  This is from an interview with DIe Zeit concerning Iraq:

Ich bin der festen Überzeugung, dass Europa nicht alles versucht hat,
was es hätte versuchen können. Wenn wir gemeinsam gehandelt hätten,
hätten wir es den USA sehr viel schwerer gemacht, an den Vereinten
Nationen vorbeizukommen. Man hätte auf die Amerikaner durch ein
einheitliches europäisches Handeln politisch anders Einfluss nehmen
können. Die Dinge hätten sich dann anders entwickelt. Ich habe immer,
auch im letzten Jahr, gesagt, eine Supermacht darf nie glauben, sie
könne auf der Welt alles allein schaffen. Aber Europa mangelte es – da
zitiere ich den Bundesaußenminister aus einem Interview im März – an
der "strategischen Dialogfähigkeit mit dem Partner Amerika". Mir wäre
wohler gewesen, wenn Deutschland für diese Dialogfähigkeit mehr getan
hätte.

So, she would have attempted to provide united European front against the US – rather than just a French-German one.  There are many issues where a Chancellor Merkel is likely to disappoint  Bush/Cheney: it is unlikely that she would authorize significant German military assistance in Iraq; she opposes Turkey’s joining the European Union; she is a liberal protestant who supports abortion rights for women.  Maybe the neo-con establishment will grow nostalgic for dear old Gerhard.  The enemy you know is far better than the enemy you do not know. 

You may also like

0 comment

Robert Daguillard May 26, 2005 - 7:26 pm

David, I think you do a good job of analyzing Angela Merkel’s position. However, keep in mind that she probably would not be able to carry out anything like a radical free-market reform agenda even if she wanted to because Germans simply will not support even a mild version thereof.
Furthermore, I believe social and labor market policy now carries over into foreign policy in the sense that “neo-liberalism” is now seen as something “American.” The problem is that the gulf between both sides of the Atlantic is so wide that any radical reform agenda in domestic policy or any far-reaching “Annaeherung” towards Washington in foreign policy will cost Merkel and the Christian-Democrats dearly.
If “Kanzlerin Merkel” disregards the dangers, look for the Social-Democrats to begin winning state elections with the speed and ease that characterized CDU/CSU triumphs in recent years!

Reply
David May 27, 2005 - 8:42 am

Richard,
I am not that optimistic about the SPD winning state elections anytime soon. It seems to me that they lack candidates with the charisma and political instincts of Schroeder. Maybe his long tenure has been damaging to the future of his party – kind of like Bill Clinton sucking all of the air out of the Democratic Party.

Reply

Leave a Reply to David Cancel Reply

Website Designed and Developed by Nabil Ahmad

Made with Love ❤️

©2004-2025 Dialog International. All Right Reserved.