Neocons Lash Out at Europe

by David VIckrey
0 comment 10 views

This weekend marked the 30th anniversary of the fall of Saigon and there was some coverage of the Vietnam war and Vietnam today. Very few journalists were willing to point out some of the parallels between Vietnam and the war in Iraq, even though Iraq exploded with new violence these last few days.  One exception was Harald Neuber, writing in Telepolis about the Vietnam-Phantom:

Die amtierende US-Regierung will von etwaigen Parallelen zwischen dem aktuellen Feldzug und dem Vietnam-Krieg verständlicherweise nichts wissen. Tatsache aber ist, dass der Widerstand im eigenen Land langsam zunimmt. Jüngst erst [extern] wies Frank Newport, der Chef des US-Umfrageinstitutes Gallup Poll, auf die ablehnende Haltung gegen beide Kriege hin. Seit Sommer 1968, so Newport, habe sich die Meinung in der US-Bevölkerung immer deutlicher durchgesetzt, der Vietnam-Krieg sei ein Fehler gewesen. Seit damals hätten dies zwölf Umfragen bestätigt. Beim letzten Meinungsbild im November 2000 haben 68 Prozent der befragten US-Bürger den damaligen Krieg als falsch verurteilt.

Support for the US occupation of Iraq is eroding within the US even though, as Neuber points out, the mainstream media have failed to report accurately on what is going on there. 

Während Redaktionen aus aller Welt in Vietnam ein dichtes Korrespondentennetz unterhielten, weist die Irak-Karte heute, journalistisch betrachtet, zahlreiche weiße Flecken auf. Aus Falludscha etwa sind auch fast sechs Monate nach der US-Offensive kaum Bilder zu sehen. Und schließlich geht es um die eigenen Todesopfer: Erst unter massivem Druck der Öffentlichkeit musste das Pentagon aufgrund des Informationsfreiheitsgesetzes, Hunderte von Bilder von Soldatensärgen zu [extern] veröffentlichen – zum ersten Mal seit dem Vietnam-Krieg.

So it is only a matter of time before the political and human costs of the insurgency in Iraq become too great for Americans to endure and they turn against continued US involvement there. 

The neocons in the Bush administration and in the press can sense that the tide of public opinion is turning against them, and are already casting about for scapegoats. In their worldview, the US military was "stabbed in the back"  in Vietnam by the liberal media and left-wing antiwar movement who prevented an American victory there, and now they are preparing for a new Dolchstosslegende for Iraq.  This time, Old Europe appears to be a convenient target for their attacks.

The EU is well past being merely silly, as its vast complex of bureaucrats tries to control what 400 million speak, eat, and think. Its biggest concerns are three: figuring out how its nations are to keep paying billions of euros to retirees, unemployed, and assorted other entitlement recipients; how to continue to ankle-bite the United States without antagonizing it to the degree that these utopians might have to pay for their own security; and how not to depopulate itself out of existence. Europeans sold Saddam terrible arms for oil well after the first Gulf War. Democratic Israel or Taiwan means nothing to them; indeed, democracy is increasingly becoming the barometer by which to judge European hostility. Cuba, China, Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah — not all that bad; the United States, Taiwan, and Israel, not all that good. Personally, I’d rather live in a country that goes into an anguished national debate over pulling the plug on a lone woman than one that blissfully vacations on the beach oblivious to 15,000 elderly cooked to well done back in Paris.

As the situation in Iraq continues to deteriorate, we can expect more anti-European rhetoric coming from the conservative press in the US.

You may also like

0 comment

Kuch May 2, 2005 - 8:59 pm

David
I have a few questions for you… First, with respect to your comment, “So it is only a matter of time before the political and human costs of the insurgency in Iraq become too great for Americans to endure and they turn against continued US involvement there,” -Is this wishful thinking, or a prediction?
Second, What are you for? I suppose one can argue about the war in Iraq forever, but the reality is that we are there, and most Americans wish for a successful conclusion. Like most on the left, all you seem to do is denounce everything about our current administration. Like Social Security (against Bush), Appeals court judges (against Bush), Iraq (against Bush)…. We know what you are against, but what are those on the left FOR?
And finally, are you German?..or are you just fluent in German? I became interested in your site because I wanted to learn about the German/European perspective through “dialogue.” It seems however, that you merely issue talking points for one of the prominant American political parties. I don’t feel as though we are getting a uniquely German perspective; only one that could just as easily be straight from MoveOn.org. The VAST majority of your articles are just negative commentary about Bush, neoconservatives, or traditional values.
You cite an article by Victor Hanson to support neocons lashing back at Europe for their “new Dolchstosslegende for Iraq.” I did not see reference to Iraq in the precise portion of the article that you included. So I read the entire Hanson piece, the word Iraq is mentioned…just once. And this single incidence is in reference to the Saudi Royal family (not Europe).
As I read the Hanson article, I see it differently. Is Europe delinquent in terms of paying for their own security? Yes, In my opinion Hanson is correct. Does the relative tenor coming out of Europe seem to be that America is worse than the PLO, Hamas, the Martyrs Brigade, China, Iran, et all? I agree with Hanson; do you? Did 15,000 elderly in France die in the heat wave two summers ago, while the vast marjority were on Holiday? I think so, do you disagree?

Reply
Arthur May 3, 2005 - 2:59 pm

Hi all,
this site is exactly what the majority of the so called “intellectual” and “liberal” German press is about:
Bashing Bush. French most sited public opinion is the same for decades: They lost their empire and don’t want to follow the US – in doubt oppose the US and vote with China and Russia and call this European moral. Why does most Germans hate Bush?
– the anti- imperialist tradition of generation 68, now making the majority in public services and media (maybe not in the industry, retail and banking sector)
– the feeling that Germany has been betrayed by Globalisation and pressure on the slow and bureaucratic economy and public processes
– disappointment that after 9.11 peace and it’s expected dividend does not materialize
– disappointment that after 9.11 internal security measures, police action (local terror groups) and foreign military action (Afghanistan) does not expose the society they are aiming for – but don’t blaming terrorists and don’t disclosing the involvement of high level sunni clerics – but blame the US bc they don’t want any confrontation with Islam.

Reply
David May 3, 2005 - 9:04 pm

Kuch,
No, I don’t agree with the anti-Europeanism of Victor Hanson and his colleagues. There are plenty of blogs you can read about anti-Americanism in Europe; I want to expose the anti-Europeanism in our country – especially from the neoconservatives who control our foreign policy now. It is sad that we live in a time when expressing support for our traditional ties to Europe and Germany are considered “left-wing”.

Reply
Kuch May 7, 2005 - 8:31 am

David
So American Conservatives are supposed to just stand by, and not respond to the barrage of Anti-Americanism coming from Europe? You say you disagree with Mr. Hanson, but you provide no details. His article provided several instances to support his opinion. I’ll ask again (your latest post did not respond to any of my open questions), which of Mr. Hanson’s observations do you think are not accurate? Does Europe provide adequate military protection of herself? Did 15,000 elderly in France not die of heat exposure (Palm Springs is full of elderly, and regularly gets well over 100 degrees F, but I’ve not heard of a similar incident there)?
You are in support of “traditional ties” to Europe. What are those? Do you mean like the period between 1950 and 1990, when the US rebuilt the entire continent, and provided protection against the Soviets, and expected very little in return? They liked us more than the communists then, but that we won the cold war, those in Europe don’t seem to like us anymore. Is it that they don’t like us, or simply no longer NEED us? You seem to pine for what you think are traditional ties to Europe, but rail on anything that embraces traditional ‘values’.

Reply
unionsbuerger April 27, 2006 - 10:47 am

Deutsche Hezbollah CSU beleidigt mit seiner Anzeige gegen MTV unsere freiheitliche Leitkultur.
Nieder mit den Zensoren.
FREIHEIT DER KUNST

Reply

Leave a Reply to unionsbuerger Cancel Reply

Website Designed and Developed by Nabil Ahmad

Made with Love ❤️

©2004-2025 Dialog International. All Right Reserved.