Harvard University announced yesterday that Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud has donated $20 million to fund a program in Islamic studies. Prince Alwaleed made the following statement about his gift.
"I am pleased to support Islamic studies at Harvard and I hope that this program will enable generations of students and scholars to gain a thorough understanding of Islam and its role both in the past and in today’s world," Prince Alwaleed said. "Bridging the understanding between East and West is important for peace and tolerance."
Such programs are needed to counter the prevailing image of Islam in both the US and the German media. These are halcyon days for "experts" that make a living spreading hate against Muslims and about Islam. Just last week the Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer received much praise for his "sensitive and thoughtful" support of torture where he complained that the detainees at Guantanamo were given the Koran when they should really be tortured. Also last week the online conservative magazine Human Events published a serious article by the Middle East "expert" Robert Spencer that compares the Koran to Mein Kampf. But probably the most dangerous exponent of anti-Muslim hate is the "Islamic scholar" Daniel Pipes, who has his own respected think tank where he routinely publishes "policy research" that, among other things, advocates incarcerating America Muslims in detention camps. Pipes routinely publishes his expert opinions on Islam on David Horowitz’s online hate magazine Front Page. A recent "symposium" at that publication included the contribution of Pipes’ German counterpart: Dr. Hans-Peter Raddatz, a scholar of Islamic Studies and author of Von Allah zum Terror? Der Djihad und die Deformierung des Westens.
In his book Raddatz accuses Pope John Paul II of "gross abuse" of the papacy in seeking dialogue with Islam. Any attempt to establish dialogue is appeasement to Islam. In numerous op/ed pieces and TV interviews Raddatz never tires of equating Isalm to terror; his outbursts frequently remind one of the anti-Asian yellow peril hysteria ( a German invention, according to Wikipedia). Here Raddatz warns about all of the Muslim babies:
Derzeit dürfte es keine Religion geben, die von radikalen Strömungen stärker gefährdet ist als der Islam. Dies hat auch mit der hohen Reproduktionsrate zu tun. Im Schnitt liegt sie etwa dreimal so hoch wie im Westen.
Earlier this year Raddatz generated a great deal of publicity for himself when he claimed that he was the target of a "death threat" on an Islamic Web site. In response to a television appearance by Raddatz the Islamic Internet portal Muslim-Markt published the following statement:
„Und wenn Herr Raddatz ein Hassprediger und Lügner ist, dann möge der allmächtige Schöpfer ihn für seine Verbrechen bestrafen und diejenigen, die trotz mehrfacher Hinweise auf die verbreiteten Unwahrheiten von Raddatz immer noch darauf bestehen, auch."
I would translate this loosely as follows: May the almighty creator punish Herr Raddatz and those that believe his lies and hate. Based on that sentence Raddatz was given round-the-clock police protection; his value in the media as an "expert commentator" has soared. But Raddatz’s anti-Islam hate is only surpassed by his cowardice: Islam.de points out that Raddatz has refused all invitations to meet with representatives of the Muslim media in Europe.
Pipes and Raddatz can be grateful that their "expertise" will be very much in demand by the Bush administration for the foreseeable future. President Bush is no longer able to sell the Iraq War as necessary because of WMDs or as a response to 9/11. Americans no longer buy the argument that the sacrifice in blood and treasure is necessary for "spreading democracy". So the administration now turns to the expert research of Pipes, Raddatz, etc. and discovers that Islamic militants want to establish a caliphate:
So now, Mr. Cheney and others warn, Al Qaeda’s ultimate goal is the re-establishment of the caliphate, with calamitous consequences for the United States. As Mr. Cheney put it in Lake Elmo, referring to Osama bin Laden and his followers: "They talk about wanting to re-establish what you could refer to as the seventh-century caliphate" to be "governed by Sharia law, the most rigid interpretation of the Koran."
Or as Mr. Rumsfeld put it on Monday: "Iraq would serve as the base of a new Islamic caliphate to extend throughout the Middle East, and which would threaten legitimate governments in Europe, Africa and Asia."
So Americans should be afraid that mullahs in turbans will soon occupy the White House and force the women of New York City to wear headscarves – unless we throw our support behind the disasterous Iraq war policy of the Bush administration. No doubt Pipes and Raddatz will be called upon to spread more fear and hatred of Islam in Europe and the US. And it shouldn’t come as a surprise if this leads to more unintended consequences, such as we’ve seen in Sydney over the past couple of days.

0 comment
“Such programs are needed to counter the prevailing image of Islam in both the US and the German media.”
Yes, but Harvard might be the wrong place.
Your Harvard link states: “Harvard University has the largest assemblage in the English-speaking world of specialists in one or another aspect of Islamic tradition”
So why do you need more money for Islamic studies???
If that prince were really interested in “Bridging the understanding between East and West” he would donate his money to state colleges in the US and Germany, who need to have more funding to teach Islam.
I think he does not care about mutual understanding. He just wanted a high-profile think or please the liberal academic elite.
“He gave a $19 million donation to South East Asia’s tsunami victims and made a SR20 million contribution during a live televised Saudi telethon to raise relief for the Pakistani earthquake victims in October 2005.”
So he gave more money for some rich academics at Harvard than to the poor victims of the tsunami…
SR20 million is 5,3 million dollars. So this guy gave four times more to Harvard than for the victims of the Pakistani earthquake.
I think this is outrageous.
Many Saudi “charities” have funded religious schools in Pakistan causing many problems for Pakistan and for the West.
One of the reasons why Islam has a bad reputation is Saudi Arabia.
Saudi charities have been exporting a crazy, fundamentalist version of Islam around the world.
If that prince would really care about East-West relations and the image of Islam, then he would not donate his money to the Harvard, but to develoment projects in the Muslim world, so that poor Muslims do not have to go fundamentalist “charities” for help and do not attend crazy religious indoctrination schools.
http://atlanticreview.org/archives/153-The-US-Saudi-relationship-Oil-supply-at-the-expense-of-US-security-and-moral-values.html
If I were in the Harvard board, I would not accept any money from the Saudi royal family until they clean up. Well, maybe I would accept their money, but then I would use it to work against them and all the harm they have done around the world.
“Such programs are needed to counter the prevailing image of Islam in both the US and the German media. These are halcyon days for “experts” that make a living spreading hate against Muslims and about Islam.”
They will continue to make a living as long as people buy it. And people will buy it, because not everybody attended Harvard or some other good university.
Pipes was educated at Harvard. And I am sure that Harvard taught him a lot about Islam, but this does not stop him from writing bad and wrong stuf about Islam.
I am sure all the other “experts” went to good schools as well.
With all due respect: This donation to Harvard is stupid and will not make any difference to the image of Islam in the US media.
He should invest the money in development work in the Muslim world and donate it to highschools , community and state colleges.
Joerg,
In a just world Harvard would donate 1/2 of its $24 billion+ endowment to the Pakistan earthquake victims.
The sad fact is the “rich get richer” – and Prince Alwaleed has made a wise investment. Harvard and Georgetown have the global prestige that can influence public discourse.
Don’t remind me that Daniel Pipes attended Harvard. We always thought it was because his Dad – Richard Pipes, a famous historian of the Soviet Union – is a professor there.
“Harvard and Georgetown have the global prestige that can influence public discourse.”
What did they say about Iraq before the war? Did they try to warn the American public about the dangers the US is getting into?
Did they use their prestige to influence public discourse or are they just a bunch of academics, who were relatively quiet before the war, but come out now and criticize the Bush administration?
With great prestige and power, comes great responsibility. (You see, I got my education from comic books rather than Harvard.)
They got the responsibility to criticize Saudi Arabia.
I am concerned, however, that the more money they get from the Saudis, the less likely such criticism will be.
“Don’t remind me that Daniel Pipes attended Harvard.”
Okay, I won’t do that. I will remind you instead that President Bush has an MBA from Harvard. 😉
What does your alma mater teach about deficit spending?
Has any Harvard professor used his prestige to influence the debate on Krauthammer or anyone else you criticize in your post?
I have not found any article or interview with a Harvard professor, when I searched Google News for “Krauthammer torture Harvard.”
Krauthammer has an MD from Harvard…
I am sure the Harvard school of medicine is very good and has a lot of funding…
Okay, this looks as if I am having my annual anti-Harvard day. I am not blaming Harvard for a handful of their alumni. There are many great Harvard alumni and great Harvard students and professors.
I would just appreciate it if Harvard would actually use the “global prestige that can influence public discourse” for a good cause.
Though, I hardly ever see an op-ed from a Harvard professor…
Huntington seems to be one who has most influenced public discourse in the 90s on a clash of civilizations.
What is Ignatieff’s position on torture, again?
Since you care about the image of Islam in the media, perhaps that prince should not have invested in Harvard but in more FOX News stocks. He has succeeded in changing their coverage of the French riots.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/france/story/0,,1665621,00.html
I hope, he will not have such an influence on Harvard as well…
You make some good points: plenty of idiots have a Harvard education (but I would wager good money that Yale has produced even more idiots).
This seems to be a good week for bashing Harvard. See this post by Dr. Dean:http://dermorgen.blogspot.com/2005/12/amerikanische-unis.html
The photograph is Memorial Hall at Harvard.
Hey David!
I am sorry – i see your posting too late (now). In my posting there was nothing negative about Harvard. This posting is *not* bashing harvard, my comment is about the good learning quality in harvard!
David!
The aim of my posting was to decribe the advantages of harvard. I was bashing the german neocon organisation “INSM”.
I think i should improve my blog with a tranlation tool.